Analysis Of Walt Disney s Transformational Leadership

Introduction The purpose of this paper is to act as a consulting analysis on how Walt Disney utilized his transformational leadership and brought to the world one of the most famous entertainment companies in the 20th century. Transformational leaders provide extraordinary motivation by appealing to people’s ideals and values and inspiring them to think about issues in new ways. It begins with a vision and the leader embeds that vision into others through encouragement, enthusiasm and motivation (Winchester, 2013). Walter Disney’s portrayed a transformational style of leadership through his work and even after his death, his leadership style continues to be effective as others adopt his ways. Walt Disney was one of the few individuals to†¦show more content†¦I will triangulate my data collection methods by using a variety of different websites, journals and articles to collect the information instead of just relying on one type of source. This will help to provide multiple theories and reduce the limitations of relying on one particular data source for my conclusions. The method used to locate sources of information was the Guelph-Humber Online Library. I selected the business tab for research and used many of the web sources included such as Primo, CBCA Complete and Business Source Complete. I will go about proving my hypothesis by close reading the different articles and books and become immersed in the text and reflect on key themes and transformational leadership qualities. I will go about this by providing real life examples of Walter Disney’s life by analyzing information received and quotes that prove my interpretations. In order to evaluate the inf ormation found, I will make sure they are credited sources and are peer-reviewed articles. Analysis Communicating his Vision It is the leaders role of establishing and supporting the values and vision by which their organizations thrive. Walt made sure that his dreams were consistent with everything he stood for such as his core values, beliefs and integrity. Walt Disney was a passionate entrepreneur who understood that his ability to be successful would depend on getting work done from others (Barrier, 2007). Walt encouraged his employees to spendShow MoreRelatedOrganizational Excellence And Change At Walt Disney Company2750 Words   |  11 Pages Client Organization Prepared by: Brittany Monroe, Michelle Kinyungu Latasha Plainer, and Queenie Jordan GM 504 Organizational Excellence and Change July 5, 2016 Unit 6: Team Assignment 1 Professor Barbara-Leigh Tonelli Introduction The Walt Disney Company plays and important role in the lives of many, through the services provided and a place where many people are employed. Understanding overall group dynamics are vital for continued improvement. It is important to note that group processesRead MoreMedia Leadership Style Analysis of Michael Eisner2006 Words   |  9 Pageshead: MEDIA LEADERSHIP STYLE ANALYSIS OF MICHAEL EISNER Media Leadership Style Analysis of Michael Eisner Whitney M. Wright Regent University Media Leadership Style Analysis of Michael Eisner Media Leadership Example Michael Eisner was recruited by Walt Disney Company from Paramount Pictures in 1984 to help Disney out of its financial slump in the 80’s. Eisner helped revamp Disney’s theme parks as well as rejuvenating their movie studio. In the process, Eisner helped â€Å"make Disney into a televisionRead MoreThe Leadership of Walt Disney Essay2346 Words   |  10 Pagesï » ¿Biographical Study The Leadership of Walt Disney Introduction This biographical study attempts to demonstrate the ways in which Walt Disney’s leadership influenced his followers through his method of leadership and the extent to which his followers influenced his leadership style. This will be demonstrated with reference to relevant leadership theories, whereby section I shall relate the leadership style of Walt Disney with reference to ‘Transformational Leadership’, and more specifically: ‘IdealisedRead MoreWalt Disney : The Organization Background Essay1881 Words   |  8 PagesThe Walt Disney Comapany The Organization Background The Walt Disney Company, allong with its partners and branches, is a entertaiment and media corporation that targets all types of families all over the world. Divided in five segments: media networks, parks and resorts, studio entertainment, consumer products and interactive media. It was born in the early 1920’s as a simple cartoon studio, till what is today, a global corporation that provides the best entertainment for the youngest to the oldestRead MoreWalt Disney Human Resource Practices2614 Words   |  11 PagesThe Walt Disney Corporation Human Resource Practices Shannon Breedlove MGMT 4242 December 8, 2011 Abstract Human resource management of an organization is an essential element of a company’s overall accomplishment of goals and business strategy. The Walt Disney Corporations has proven itself a leader in HR management over its eighty-eight years in the business. It has grown into a global company within the consumer services sector and the industry of media conglomerates. The paper will demonstrateRead MoreDisney Pixar5510 Words   |  23 PagesMaking Disney Pixar Into A Learning Organization * James M. Haley and Mohammed H. Sidky This study examines how leadership, teamwork, and organizational learning can contribute in making mergers and acquisitions work. Our intention is to identify critical factors and practices needed for merger success. Our research is part of an ongoing project, and builds on previous analysis of merger success/failure in such organizations as Standard Oil, Exxon Mobile, and Time Warner-AOL. In this paper, weRead MoreStrategic Management - Pixar - Success4064 Words   |  17 Pages Assignment: Strategic Management and Leadership Table of contents Question 1 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2. External analysis of Pixar Animation Studios 3 1.2.1. Macro environment 3 1.2.2. PESTEL-Analysis 3 1.2.2.1. Political factors 3 1.2.2.2. Economic factors 4 1.2.2.3. Social factors 4 1.2.2.4. Technological factors 4 1.2.2.5. Environmental factors 4 1.2.2.6. Legal factors 4 1.2.2.7. Conclusion 4 1.3. Internal analysis of Pixar Animation Studios 5 1.3.1. PrincipleRead MorePixar- Culture and Organisations Essay3749 Words   |  15 Pagesall ages (Pixar, 2009).† In 2006, Pixar entered a 7.6 billion dollar agreement to work with the Walt Disney Company. The Pixar Company is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Disney (La Franco, 2006). Although the merger has been a success long term, it has not been without its problems. Pixar’s unique ‘hands off’ management culture has often conflicted with Disney’s traditional bureaucratic leadership style. The animation industry is a highly competitive environment, with Pixar’s biggest competitionRead MoreIndividual Reflection Paper on Your 5020 Group Experience4784 Words   |  20 Pagesreflection paper is a compilation of what Group or Team C, experience during the execution of the Group Project Paper on Goal Setting in Organizations within Burger King Corporation. The paper covers important topics such as how the group was formed, leadership, the evolution of the group/team over the term, group/team dynamics, group structure, team communication and Intergroup/intra-group conflict. This paper connects the individual experiences within group dynamics concepts presented in the courseRead MoreHp Transformation Leadership21564 Words   |  87 PagesTRANSFORMATION Leadership at HP | Under supervision of DR. Ahmed Farouk | | This report will present transformation process of hp corp. By discussing the following topics: Organization background, organization culture specifically â€Å"hp way†, One of the leaders who leaded the company towards a great transformation, hp before and after the transformation and finally discussing the role of the human resource in the transformation

Melvilles Moby Dick Comparing the Missions of Ahab and...

Herman Melville began working on this novel Moby Dick in 1850. In this book Melville challenges the relationship man have with his universe, his fate, and his God. Ahab represents a human being made up of evil, when he decides to questions God fate, and goes against God when he tries to strike Moby Dick the whale. The whale in this novel represents God. Moby-Dick, can teach you many things if you can remain focused long enough. However, the most important lesson that can be learned from the work is not that hard to understand. This lesson about this novel can be summed up in one sentence; Captain Ahab mission leads him to death, as Ishmael leads him to life because when a man tries to discover their ultimate purpose on land, and does so†¦show more content†¦This lesson is very true, and can be related to real life situation, when compared to examples such as government dictatorships or social relationships. For instance, many dictatorships are lead by one person with ove rwhelming power over his or her nation. This, in most cases, ends up with a greedy and uncontrollable leader who leads their country to certain downfall. No different from how Ahab leads the crew members to death. Also, on a much more common scale, some relationships can symbolize this lesson. For example, say one person is very much so attracted to another. If this person were to become so attracted to their â€Å"significant other† that they put aside more important matters, such as their job or academics, they would more than likely regret it, if it were to overtake their life to the point where they become depressed, or in Ahab’s case insane. This is the one of the reason why Ahab quest failed to killing Moby Dick. The alternative is that Ishmael the only surviving crew member of the Peqoud survives mainly because he wasn’t going against God like Ahab. Ahab is the captain of the whaling ship Pequod, and their mission is to go on a sea voyage and bring ba ck as many whales as possible for the standard use of oil. Ahab has a different mission plan set in his mind, then the other entire crew member aboard the ship. The scars and wooden leg they are on his body are just horrible reminders of what can go wrong when a man tries to go

Mobilizing creativity and innovation

Question: Discuss about the Human Resource Management ? Answer: Introduction Creativity is considered as backbone for effective working of the organization. to remain competitive in the market, an organization should promote creativity and innovation at the organization as well as individual level. Improvement in creativity and innovation in the employees, individual and organizational level can lead to dramatic improvement in the organization and its survival. Creativity is a key for success achieving the set targets of the organization with application of effective means and smart work. However by analyzing the application of critical thinking and innovation in the company, it is said as a complex process. This is so, as everyone has their own perspective of ideas, hence it is very difficult for the management to arrive at a common idea (APS, 2012). Analysis How individual creativity can lead to improvement in the organization By critical thinking at individual and employee level can bring effectiveness and flexibility in the working of the organization. Creative thinking can be in any form such as providing flexibility to workers for work, relaxations of rules and regulations, following of communication structure in the organization. For example in case of Google, the employees have to work on their own project in the whole day of a week. By rewarding and positive reinforcement other employees will get motivated to work creatively. With the application of creative thinking, an organization will get diversified ideas to work upon, this would lead to increase in the interaction level between the management and employees and it would be easier for exchanging ideas in future (Best practice consulting, 2017). Individual blocks to creative thinking Following are the eight blocks which lead to reduction in individual creative thinking and creativity. However in addition to these eight blocks there can be some other blocks also, which can reduce the individual creativity. Individual believes himself as non creative: If the individual will keep telling himself or the persons around him that he is not creative; after some time it would be realized that the individual mind would stop working for creativity and it would be blocked. Forming assumptions: if the individual would start making too many assumptions; this would restrict the scope for creative thinking. Hence individual should be smart enough to reject some assumptions. Complying with rules and regulations too strictly: if the management has made too many rules and regulations at the initial level of generating ideas. This would lead to restrict the scope of ideas from individuals. This is so because to generate more ideas, management should provide freedom, openness to its individuals (Infinite ideas, 2012). Being too serious: creativity can only be ensured if the individual has fun, spontaneity, laughter quality. Hence to be creative, individual must promote fun and laughter. Avoiding risk: to be creative and to bring unique ideas, some mistakes or wrong ideas must be tolerated by the management. Hence individual and management should kept in mind that doing wrong or doing bad is a normal thing, mistakes are just to make the individual learn and not to repeat the mistakes again. Always relying on own habits: to become innovative, individual must come out from his comfort zone. Hence to bring creative ideas, individual must change his habits and stay free of mind. Assuming one situation only: sometimes it is presumed by the individual that there can only be one situation for the given issue or problem due to which he fails to analyze the other perspectives of the problem or issue. Forming judgments quickly: Ideas should be evaluated efficiently by the individual or management. This is because if the ideas would be judged very quickly, individual and management would not be able to analyze the missed out figures and related issues (Balaceanu, 2016). Evaluation of critical problem solving Critical problem solving technique is highly adopted in many organizations. It helps the organization in ways like: improving the quality as well as quality of product and services, it develops use of some new techniques which lead to efficiency in cost. It also results in developing many organizational strategies, generation of innovative ideas. Creation of more innovative ideas results into widening scope of solutions for problems at different levels from different perspectives. This is so, because every individual has his/her different opinion or creativity. Creative thinking in organization would lead to brain storming, SWOT analysis and mid mapping of different situation which come across in the regular working of the organization. Critical thinking is majorly used when decisions are taken at corporate level and requires a major set of alternatives (Creative education foundation, 2015). Challenges in applying creative thinking in the organization One of the biggest challenges in promoting creative thinking in the organization is that, the management should also be ready to receive failure. This is so because; innovative and creative thinking does not ensure success in achievement of the goals of the company. Besides this one of the biggest challenge in critical thinking from the part of employees, is that if the employees feel that they are being judged, there would be lack of creative and innovative ideas, and then finally it would result into negative impact in the minds of employees (Isaksen, 2013). Using Osborn-Parnes as a framework facilitate a CPS session Osborn has developed some creative tools in creative thinking in 1953. According to him, brainstorming can only be used to produce a checklist of ideas, these ideas plays a role of providing solutions to solve the problem in organization. According to him, introduction of ideas comes earlier as compare to idea evaluation. This is done so to promote the quantity and quality of ideas. Creative thinking leads to a situation where innovation and creativity comes out from employees (Make happy, 2016). Using Osborn-Parnes technique critical problem session can be structured such as: according to them, there are two choices like introduction of the ideas and evaluation of ideas. In critical success session, there are four steps that need to be followed which are as: clarify, ideate, develop and implement (Rethinking education, 2012). Clarify: this step explore vision of the organization, it gathers data to enable the management for better understanding to the alternatives and problem. Ideate: this step explore various set of alternatives to answer the questions. Develop: it helps the management in selecting the best alternative from the set of alternative ideas. This step helps the management arriving at solutions from various ideas. This step involves an analysis of SWOT analysis of the organization to select the best fit for the problem. Implement: after selection of best alternative, this step helps the management in implementing that particular idea or solution. It identifies the steps roles and responsibilities that need to be performed by the individuals or employees (Henry, 2006). For implementing critical thinking in the organization, management needs to answer 5 W. Here 5 W stands for who, what, where, when and why. It also tells about H that is how. Who answers who would be involved in the process, who would be finalizing the idea, and who would be most benefitted if the problem has been solved and if not, who would be most benefitted. What answers how summarization can be done for analyzing the problem. It describes about what measures has been taken till now. It answers by making the user presume that if the employee came across the same problem in his personal life, then how he/she would have taken the decision. Besides this, it also answers the management attitude towards problem and would be the result satisfying (Judkins, 2015). Where answers about the time of implementing the solution and occurrence of the problem. When answers about the time when the problem has been raised, the time when management wants to take measures to solve the problem. Why answers the importance of the problem and importance of finding out the alternatives that is whether finding the solutions to the given issue is really important for the user, whether implementing such change would lead to generation of opportunity for the firm or not. It also answers how: that is how the particular employee or individually is involved in the issue, how long the problem would take to get resolved (Procter, 2002). Recommendation By analyzing the report it can be said that, creativity and innovation can be brought up in the individuals only if there are strategies like this. To promote creativity and innovation in the organization, there should be open communication in the organization. Besides this, there should not be any bureaucracy, as this leads to a situation called as authoritative and subordinate. While for creative ideas there should be open and sometimes informal communications should be there, so that employees or individuals feel free to open up their ideas in front of the management (Sousa, Monteiro, Walton, and Pissarra, 2012). Conclusion It can be concluded that, to promote creativity and innovation in the organization, individual must be free from his habits or rules and regulation in the organization. If he will not come out from his comfort zone he would not be able to analyze the other perspective of the problem or issue. Besides this, individual should be free from fear of mistakes, as mistakes make the individual learn and brings sharpness in his mind. References APS,. (2012) Innovation in organisation. Retrieved on 8th March, 2017 from https://www.inventium.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Innovation-in-Organisations-APS-Shelley-Logan.pdf Balaceanu, A,. (2016) Alphagamma, How creative thinking can save your business. Retreived on 8th March, 2017 from https://www.alphagamma.eu/entrepreneurship/creative-thinking-can-save-business/ Best practice consulting,. (2017) Articles, The benefits of a creative workplace. Retrieved on 8th March, 2017 from https://www.bestpracticeconsulting.com.au/_blog/Articles/post/Fostering_creativity_in_the_workplace/ Creative education foundation,. (2015) Creative problem solving tools techniques resource guide. Retrieved on 10th March, 2017 from https://www.creativeeducationfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ToolsTechniques-Guide-FINAL-web-watermark.pdf Henry, J,. (2006) Creative management and development, SAGE, London Infinite ideas,. (2012) Creative thinking: mind flexing, brain storming, juice-flowing ways to discover your inner genius, Infinite ideas, United Kingdom Isaksen, S, G,. (2013) The creative problem solving group, Inc. Retrieved on 10th March, 2017 from https://www.cpsb.com/research/articles/creative-problem-solving/Conceptual-Foundations-of-Creative-Problem-Solving.html Judkins, R,. (2015) The art of creative thinking, Hachette, United Kingdom Make happy,. (2016) Creativity. Innovation. Growth training programme 2016: workshop training. Retrieved on 10th March, 2017 from https://www.makehappy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/MakeHappy_Workshops_and_Training.pdf Procter, T,. (2002) Creative problem solving for managers: developing skills for decision making and innovation. Retrieved on 10th March, 2017 from https://www.rudyct.com/sm_cps_txt/Proctor-CPSforManagers.pdf Rethinking education,. (2012) Developing the creative and innovative potential of young people through non-formal learning in ways that are relevant to employability. Retrieved on 10th March, 2017 from https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/youth/news/2014/documents/report-creative-potential_en.pdf Sousa, F,. Monteiro, I,. Walton, A and Pissarra, J,. (2012) Learning from failure: a case study on creative problem solving. Retrieved on 10th March, 2017 from https://www.apgico.pt/newsletters/2012/ficheiros/nl_04/LearningFromFailure.pd

Is Freedom Of Choice A Right Or A Responsibility That Is That The Que

Is freedom of choice a right or a responsibility? That is that the question which will determine the outcome in ?woman vs. doctors?. The problem is this: a woman wishes to have her child born naturally. If this happens her baby will most likely be born retarded. The way her baby is positioned inside her, within a few months, the baby would not receive enough oxygen and the birth process would be drastically altered. If it is a choice, then the baby will be born naturally. If it is not a choice, the baby will be born via cesarean section. The main argument in the mothers case is that it is her child and therefore her decision. The main argument for the doctors is that the baby will be born retarded or possibly dead. The baby is hers; It is that simple. Should the doctors have any right to reject her religious beliefs for beliefs of there own. Now you can argue logic and probability versus religion, but that again is a one sided battle. For decades Scientists and Christians have argued fact and logic versus miracles and God. The only conclusion that has ever been reached is this: according to Christians Jesus walked on water. According to Scientists that is physically not possible. Who is right? We as a society are willing to accept both however, so how can we not accept her beliefs now? Is it because certain beliefs mean more than others, or that is it that we feel we can intervene when it is convenient for us. Does she not have a right to control what happens to her body? In a country founded on principles of religious freedom, if this woman believes that her god will take care of the baby, who is the government to tell her she has to have an operation? In the case of the doctor telling her patient that she needs to have a c-section to save the life of her child, we need to realize that the doctor is just doing his/hers job. If the doctor's opinion counts for so much, the lady needs to listen. If she did not want the opinion of a doctor, she should not have gone to the doctor. Also in the case of the doctor, lets just say that if the female goes against the wishes of the doctor and the lady went with her instincts and the baby died, the doctor and the hospital will be facing a law suit of some sort. The real issue is about murder, the case is not about anything else. Especially since this is the nineties, and every person is looking for a quick buck. There is not an issue about the women's rights, it is about the right of the child, the human being, which is also a life. Event though the fetus is not standing on it's own two feet, it still matters. In this case I feel the doctor has the right to suggest and try to persuade the lady to have a cesarean section. Now, it is the lady's decision to believe in the doctor or go on with her very strong belief of God. I do not believe that this should be considered a murder trial, because then the issues of abortion will arise and this will go into a whole other issue. The lady should have her own decision and everyone else should just sit back and see what happens.